Global markets rally again
The article expresses optimism about the buoyancy that the stock markets all over the world but, at the same time, questions the sustainability of this buoyancy. It also talks about the opportunities for investors to tap the shares at the rock-bottom prices.
Most of the markets have rallied in the range of 25% from their lows reached early this month. The major booster, besides the fiscal and monetary measures by governments all over the world, has been the US plan to buy all the toxic assets from banks. But the real question is how long would this rally sustain? Stock markets generally reflect the real pick up some six months in advance. Looking at the indications of revival US consumers spending has rose in the second successive month, housing market has recovered little, commodities are up sharply from their Dec ’08 lowest levels, manufacturing has picked up in China while in India steel producers claim to run their factories back at full capacity. However the litmus test would be the January-March quarterly results. If not improvement, even stability would provide some support. However any negative news would dictate a nosedive in the indices worldwide.
The real opportunity here is for the investors looking for handsome gains over medium to long term period. With money in virtually zero interest money market ready to rush in is the first sign of recovery.
Confusing Price Indices
The article tries to clarify the confusion that often emerges when an average person looks at different price indices like WPI, CPI etc that reflect paradoxical trends.
While WPI went below 6% this January year-on-year basis, the CPI reached a high of 10.4% for urban non-manual and industrial workers while more then 11% for agricultural as well as rural laborers. Looking at this one might see them contradicting. But the catch here is the items comprising these indices and their relative weightage. For WPI, primary, intermediate and manufactured items that aren’t directly consumed by an average person forms a major part while CPI consists of items that are consumed by end consumer. Like food, beverage etc constitute 49% of CPI for industrial workers but little more then 28% in WPI. On the other hand fuel prices account for little over 6% in CPI-IW but more then 14% in WPI. Another difference is the stage at which the data is captured. WPI reflects ex-factory price which excludes duties and excise while CPI captures retail prices at which the items are sold to consumers. So while WPI helps fiscal and monetary policy measurements by reflecting the cost push inflation, CPI is a better indication of cost of living.
Thus in the nutshell, rather then being dragged by headline WPI numbers, the inflation analysis should take into account various components of the index.
Not quite an art
The article tries to find out whether science can answer the reason behind suicidal tendencies and that if it is a hereditary or not.
Taking an example of Sylvia Plath, one of the finest poets of 20th century, wrote once that “DYING/Is an art, like everything else/I do it exceptionally well” in Lady Lazarus. After several attempts she finally did it in her London flat in 1963 at the age of 30 while her two children were asleep the next room. However, an excellent observer would immediately point out at the genealogy of self-extinguishing tendencies of the family as her son, one of the two sleeping in the next room when Sylvia took the extreme step, Nicolas Hughes, aged 47, committed suicide in his home in Alaska a few days back. The family seems to have history in suicidal tendencies as Nicolas’ father’s (Ted Hughes, a distinguished poet) another wife also killed herself. This raises question in the scientific community whether suicidal tendencies are hereditary. Referring to some scientific journals, there is a possibility that there is a link, and ends with a talk of receptors and neurotransmitters in the brain which can adduce such grey matter tendencies.
While the poet has the last words, “I have given my name and my day-clothes up to the nurses/And my history to the anesthetist and my body to surgeons”, it seems he knows better and before.